This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add bootstrap-lto-slim build config

From: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak at linux dot intel dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:19:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add bootstrap-lto-slim build config
References: <1286792263-9244-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1286792263-9244-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1010171840550.2945@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20101017175929.GA17857@gargoyle.fritz.box> <20101017230546.GB19745@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

> -flto-slim. I expect that user who knows what it is will know it as fat objects.
> Users who doesn't will just wonder what slim-lto is...

I agree that's a good idea longer term, but short term there still
need to be some issues with slim worked out (like adding
all the necessary wrappers, fixing libtool in tree, add 
passthrough, more testing etc.) 

So right now I think it's better to keep it optional.

Short term it would help if people actually reviewed the patch :)

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] Add native ELF and LTO support in collect2
  - From: Andi Kleen
- [PATCH 2/3] Add bootstrap-lto-slim build config
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add bootstrap-lto-slim build config
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add bootstrap-lto-slim build config
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add bootstrap-lto-slim build config
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]