This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Reorganizing -flto and -fwhopr command line options (Was Re: WHOPR partitioning, take 2)
On 17/10/2010 17:37, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> I'm really undecided on whether and what to do now to all the option
>> mess (given it's pre-existent in GCC 4.5).
>
> Given the state (and presumably not so widespread use) of LTO with
> GCC 4.5 I would not worry about compatibility from 4.5 to 4.6 a lot.
>
> Gerald
Does that go for the LTO IR format too? Could we change struct lto_header
to include a compressed_size member, so that LTO sections don't have to be
single-byte aligned any more and we still know exactly how much zlib data to
decompress?
cheers,
DaveK