This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: backport blockers for in-tree build
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: rguenther at suse dot de
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:44:36 +0200
- Subject: Re: backport blockers for in-tree build
- References: <20100926134200.GA24480@gmx.de>
Ping http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02033.html
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 03:42:00PM CEST:
> There has been a conspicuous absence of new reports about failed in-tree
> builds. Either users have gotten more diligent at checking prior bugs
> in the bugzilla (yeah, right), or we *have* fixed most of those in the
> trunk. Witness comment trail in
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619>.
>
> So, with that in mind, I'd like to backport the warning for
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32272> which is
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01256.html>
>
> and the fix for <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619>
> which is <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01238.html>
>
> both to all active branches. OK?
>
> With the remaining, java-specific
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43258> eventually fixed,
> that would then make obsolete
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210>
> until we add new regressions in this area.