Re: PATCH: PR libstdc++/45863: [4.6 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

["H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>]

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>> Everything can change in the future, and I have a hard time believing
>> that the LVM2 pvs does anything but error out if called with -dsvo
>> <shared object>, but I've seen too much bad error handling to argue.
>>
>> How about the following patch? ?It creates the same output for
>> libstdc++.so on Solaris 10/x86 as my previous script and output for
>> libc.so.6 on Linux/x86_64 is identical to the one currently on mainline.
>>
>> I've created the patch with diff -wup to hide whitespace differences
>> from the changed indentation.
>>
>> I'll fire off another i386-pc-solaris2.10 bootstrap to be extra sure
>> this works, maybe H.J. can test it on Linux?
>>
>> Ok for mainline thereafter?
>>
> this version seems pretty robust and safe to me as far as Linux is
> concerned. Thus, again, I'm Ok with it, if regtesting is fine.
>

It looks good me too.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.