This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RX] Minor patches

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:45:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [RX] Minor patches
References: <201008250231.o7P2VmpU006677@greed.delorie.com> <4C7548AB.7090208@redhat.com> <201008270030.o7R0UFBw025485@greed.delorie.com> <4C77D72E.7010102@redhat.com>

> Well, output_operand_lossage reports user errors in asms, and
> ICEs for normal insns.  If this is a normal insn, then you 
> should have diagnosed the user error earlier.

It's a builtin : __builtin_rx_mvtipl() but the %F is only used for
that one opcode.

Should the user-level error() be moved to rx_expand_builtin_mvtipl()
instead?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RX] Minor patches
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [RX] Minor patches
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [RX] Minor patches
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [RX] Minor patches
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [RX] Minor patches
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]