This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, libjava] use -fnon-call-exceptions rather than -fasynchronous-unwind-tables.


On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:30 AM, IainS
<developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
> IIUC, the following should be the 'correct' approach.
> OK for trunk? (with an appropriate changelog, ?of course).
> Iain

That doens't match what the comment says.  What is it the correct
approach for?

> Index: libjava/classpath/configure.ac
> ===================================================================
> --- libjava/classpath/configure.ac ? ? ?(revision 163330)
> +++ libjava/classpath/configure.ac ? ? ?(working copy)
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ if test "x${COMPILE_JNI}" = xyes; then
> ? ? dnl CFLAGS that are used for all native code. ?We want to compile
> ? ? dnl everything with unwinder data so that backtrace() will always
> ? ? dnl work.
> - ? ?EXTRA_CFLAGS='-fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables'
> + ? ?EXTRA_CFLAGS='-fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions'
> ? ? AC_SUBST(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
>
> ? ? dnl Strict warning flags which not every module uses.
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]