This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] remove more df_byte_scan corpses


On 08/17/2010 12:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The whole DF_REF_EXTRACT machinery can be eliminated, and only the flags
> left in for the benefit of IRA.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok?

Looks ok to me.

I wonder if there's any point to DF_REF_*_EXTRACT, and why there's a
need to have both DF_REF_PARTIAL and DF_REF_READ_WRITE?


Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]