This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Combine four insns

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:06:21 +0200
Subject: Re: Combine four insns
References: <4C5C20D0.5020105@codesourcery.com> <AANLkTimmPSgpS=1RcHqZD94=yN+kT-MqNd9-i2_Ywc=t@mail.gmail.com> <4C5C6BAA.4030703@codesourcery.com> <AANLkTikyui9waDT8hv_30xRtBHOvb85phZhbVaO+uEs3@mail.gmail.com> <4C6162D4.6080605@codesourcery.com> <AANLkTim=8XK9ZVjzvJBKerQtuCB3qfsk_zR_30PcQqdn@mail.gmail.com> <4C616617.8060703@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 04:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> You could enable the heuristic with optimize < 3 && !optimize_size
>> (thus keep combining everything at -O3 and -Os).
>
> I could do that. ?I just need to know what the consensus opinion is.

Seems reasonable to me fwiw.

Ciao!
Steven

References:
- Combine four insns
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Combine four insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Combine four insns
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Combine four insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Combine four insns
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Combine four insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Combine four insns
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]