This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Don't completely scalarize a record if it contains bit-field (PR tree-optimization/45144)


On 08/05/2010 03:40 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Jie Zhang<jie@codesourcery.com> wrote:
Thanks for your comment! How about this version? I moved the check into
type_consists_of_records_p. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64.
Also checked by building linux kernel and made sure there were no
regressions.

This is ok if Martin is ok with it.


Yes, it's fine, I can't really think of any other quick way of dealing
with this.

Thanks Richard and Martin. I have committed it on trunk.

--
Jie Zhang
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]