This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [CFT, try 8] Emulated tls rewrite

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, jh at suse dot cz
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:32:46 -0700
Subject: Re: [CFT, try 8] Emulated tls rewrite
References: <4C3E4D3C.1030205@redhat.com> <4C44AA95.9000505@redhat.com> <AANLkTinvBHYu_oKTnyKlAu-l4Xk1TiowMWSPsW1La97D@mail.gmail.com> <4C45CBEC.7020400@redhat.com> <AANLkTilHQZZqORUeO9Jh5xqtRQuTwIM28iFelT8aZ1pB@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/21/2010 01:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Couldn't you do gsi_insert_on_edge_immediate?

I could.  It doesn't really help though, since the location at which
the call statement and the call edge are created is shared between
the normal statements and the phi statements.  It gets ugly either way.

> Btw, edge
> frequencies for calls that call to external functions are not used
> for anything I think.

Tell that to verify_cgraph.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- [CFT, try 9] Emulated tls rewrite
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [CFT, try 7] Emulated tls rewrite
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [CFT, try 8] Emulated tls rewrite
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [CFT, try 8] Emulated tls rewrite
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [CFT, try 8] Emulated tls rewrite
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [CFT, try 8] Emulated tls rewrite
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]