This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, darwin] do not generate branch islands when the linker can do it.

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:44:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, darwin] do not generate branch islands when the linker can do it.
References: <01CDBBB5-4E03-4483-ADCC-454819159375@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <4C3F478D.4060405@redhat.com> <8987CD7A-53F6-45B1-9A88-E27107B1AAFB@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>

On 07/15/2010 11:27 AM, IainS wrote:
> +#ifndef TARGET_MACHO_BRANCH_ISLANDS
> +#  define TARGET_MACHO_BRANCH_ISLANDS 0
> +#endif

This could go next to the TARGET_MACHO definition in i386.h, for consistency.

>From a i386 maintainer perspective, I think this is ok.  I'll defer
for ppc and darwin knowledge.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, darwin] do not generate branch islands when the linker can do it.
  - From: IainS

References:
- [Patch, darwin] do not generate branch islands when the linker can do it.
  - From: IainS
- Re: [Patch, darwin] do not generate branch islands when the linker can do it.
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [Patch, darwin] do not generate branch islands when the linker can do it.
  - From: IainS

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]