This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [CFT, try 7] Emulated tls rewrite

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:59:35AM +0100, IainS wrote:
> On 15 Jul 2010, at 08:48, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Richard Henderson <>  
>> wrote:
>>> This go-around handles phi nodes, as requested by Richi.  This was  
>>> much more
>>> irritating than it should have been, due to immediate use  
>>> maintainence.  It
>> Hm, interesting.  I skimmed around the tree and SET_PHI_ARG_DEF
>> should do the job.
>>> also gets re-arranged to use walk_gimple_ops, which I should have  
>>> been using
>>> in the first place.
>>> The testsuite is still running here, amd64-linux --disable-tls, but  
>>> I'm
>>> quitting for today.  I never got around to looking at those non- 
>>> tls.exp
>>> testsuite failures, Iain.  Hopefully they went away magically.  ;-)
>> Overall it looks reasonable, minus the various ???s.
> unfortunately, although it applies cleanly, it doesn't bootstrap for me 
> (against either 162180 or 162193).
> (fails in building libgomp/parallel.c with 'caller edge frequency 1000  
> does not match BB frequency of 61')...
> ... I will look a little more - but this is uncharted territory for me ;)

Bootstraps on x86_64-apple-darwin10 fine here. Regression testresults at...

Did you start with a fresh tree before applying the new patch?

> Iain

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]