This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] Cleaning up generic TBPs

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:00:14 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] Cleaning up generic TBPs
References: <AANLkTinM6QEgeEeh-gFggV2j3b19UYam51SnUff6cXRo@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikgHhaBeYuaDtOzZzdUpsSD8HANRIByqIQN5WNQ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimQYlGh66T54OFzUnkjx0le7oBfaqVf114qzSpx@mail.gmail.com>

>>> The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with no failures.
>>> Ok for trunk?
>
> Yes - OK for trunk with the testcases.

Thanks, Paul. I have committed it as r162125, together with a slight
modification in 'add_procs_to_declared_vtab' to fix the regression
that Dominique reported (and a corresponding test case).

Btw, it seems that bugzilla is currently not accessible. Does anyone
know why? Is it finally being upgraded or just plain broken?

Cheers,
Janus

References:
- [Patch, Fortran, OOP] Cleaning up generic TBPs
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] Cleaning up generic TBPs
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] Cleaning up generic TBPs
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]