This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, objc] maintenance, make Obj{C,C++} LTO-friendly.
On 10 Jul 2010, at 07:55, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 9, 2010, at 5:25 PM, IainS wrote:
On 9 Jul 2010, at 06:59, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:19 PM, IainS wrote:
This patch is intended to maintain the 'status-quo' in the
presence of LTO.
OK for trunk?
[ after more thought and some more offline email... ]
Ok with the:
Well, I found the cause of our section hassles and fixed it as
obvious (I hope that doesn't exceed the approval).
Yeah, I do like this version better... If we wanted to bullet proof
this, we could assert that bss_initializer_p isn't true on the
things that can't tolerate switching
given that this fixes a regression present on the introduction of LTO,
and that LTO has been back-ported to 4.5
Is this eligible for backport to 4.5 with/without Nathan's VEC changes?
Iain
- References:
- [Patch, objc] maintenance, make Obj{C,C++} LTO-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, objc] maintenance, make Obj{C,C++} LTO-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, objc] maintenance, make Obj{C,C++} LTO-friendly.
- Re: [Patch, objc] maintenance, make Obj{C,C++} LTO-friendly.