This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add

From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:56:52 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add
References: <4C2AF62F.4030700@codesourcery.com> <4C2B753D.3050900@redhat.com> <4C2B7B54.1090803@codesourcery.com> <4C2CDA20.70803@redhat.com> <4C2CDDCE.9000807@codesourcery.com> <4C2DC672.2090208@codesourcery.com> <4C2DD4AD.8000402@gnu.org> <4C34B13A.3080605@redhat.com>

On 07/07/2010 06:54 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> I'm still reviewing the data -- a pair of 2% regressions is pretty
> significant.

Note that Jie's raw data for wupwise suggests that there isn't actually
that big a regression there, it just picked a high value in one run and
a low value in the other, but there were instances of both in either run.

Bernd

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add
  - From: Jie Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add
  - From: Jie Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] Enhance reload_cse_move2add
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]