This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gimple] assignments to volatile
On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> did you not read my original problem statement?
I did read it.
> You seem to be ignoring associated issues that come with that interpretation, which I mentioned.
I'm aware of them. We'd all benefit if the C and C++ committees refined the language to make things more clear and to match each other.
> Could you clarify what you also claim the following expression-statements should reread?
Below is my take on what we should do.
> vobj;
read.
> vobj = data;
no re-read
> expr, vobj = data;
no re-read.