This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Resubmit/ping: peephole2 vs cond-exec vs df
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On 06/30/2010 11:48 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/30/2010 06:56 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This seems to work.
>>>>
>>>> Please commit then. ?Sorry about the breakage, I guess one has to test
>>>> changes to i386.md on both targets.
>>>
>>> I have committed it. ?Bootstrap continues until libjava which still
>>> fails for me running out of virtual memory (16GB ulimit):
>>
>> Is that new with the peephole2 patch?
>
> No. ?It is in fact
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44722
We're peepholing in circles after your patch. The peephole2
dump isn't very informative - how can I see which peephole2s
matched?
Richard.
> Richard.
>
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>