This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix wrong type merging in LTO compiler

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:16:51 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix wrong type merging in LTO compiler
References: <201005261752.04577.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <AANLkTik7MaozQQ7nZzFJRxZtJwoajhBk-xsvDk_xR84N@mail.gmail.com>

> Hmm, we already test alignment for scalars at the start of the
> function.  So can you instead try to move the alignment check
> from the INTEGRAL_TYPE_P () ... case to a check right
> before that covering all types?

Not sure if TYPE_ALIGN really applies to all types (METHOD_TYPE, OFFSET_TYPE).
At least we're sure it does to RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P as per stor-layout.c.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix wrong type merging in LTO compiler
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [patch] Fix wrong type merging in LTO compiler
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [patch] Fix wrong type merging in LTO compiler
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]