This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++] Fix PR middle-end/44100

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:58:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [C++] Fix PR middle-end/44100
References: <201005172120.07234.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <599F0062-5382-4CD6-8E7A-91224103AA08@gmail.com> <201005172148.16105.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

Sent from my iPhone

On May 17, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:

Well this is not a constant intergal expression so it should be rejected with -pedantic-errors. Well and maybe even by default for C ++ front-end. This is what that test is testing I think.
No, it is testing the absence of ICE, see PR c/25682.

Well maybe I should rephrase my comment. Does -pedantic-error still errors with that construct? If so is there a testcase for that case?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


--
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++] Fix PR middle-end/44100
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [C++] Fix PR middle-end/44100
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [C++] Fix PR middle-end/44100
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [C++] Fix PR middle-end/44100
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]