This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Currently in gcc trunk, a large number of testcases are
not configured to run against emutls. The attached patch changes
these instances of...
dg-require-effective-target tls_native
...to...
dg-require-effective-target tls
With these changes, all of the testcases pass on
x86_64-apple-darwin10/i386-apple-darwin10 at -m64
with the exception of...
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c conflict with user-defined section (test for errors, line 12)
and on x86_64-apple-darwin10/i386-apple-darwin10 at -m32...
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler tcc1@
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler tcc2@
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler-not tcc1[^@]
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler-not tcc2[^@]
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c conflict with user-defined section (test for errors, line 12)
when used against the approved emutls patch...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00824.html
Okay for gcc trunk after the handling of the gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c
and gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c testcases is sorted out (i.e. should those
be skipped or left in place with PRs opened for them)?
Jack
Attachment:
tls_native-changelog.txt
Description: Text document
Attachment:
tls_native.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |