This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR c++/43890

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Fabien CHÊNE <fabien dot chene at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:00:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/43890
References: <m2h8640d6051004272159ne4da1f9dw3e40710e5cdd0ef7@mail.gmail.com> <n2y8640d6051004281146y10a21dbdue188519730284000@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Fabien CHÊNE <fabien.chene@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a better patch that move the check for user-provided
> constructor out of the loop.
> Tested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2010-04-26 ?Fabien Chêne ?<fabien.chene@gmail.com>
> ? ? ? PR c++/43890
> ? ? ? * g++.dg/init/pr43890.C: New.
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> 2010-04-26 ?Fabien Chêne ?<fabien.chene@gmail.com>
> ? ? ? PR c++/43890
> ? ? ? * init.c (diagnose_uninitialized_cst_or_ref_member): check for
> ? ? ? user-provided constructor while recursing.
>

This patch caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43951

-- 
H.J.

References:
- [PATCH] PR c++/43890
  - From: Fabien CHÊNE
- Re: [PATCH] PR c++/43890
  - From: Fabien CHÊNE

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]