This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:23:09AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> @@ -26765,7 +26765,7 @@ extended_reg_mentioned_1 (rtx *p, void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) >> ?bool >> ?x86_extended_reg_mentioned_p (rtx insn) >> ?{ >> - ?return for_each_rtx (INSN_P (insn) ? &PATTERN (insn) : &insn, >> + ?return for_each_rtx (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn) ? &PATTERN (insn) : &insn, >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?extended_reg_mentioned_1, NULL); >> ?} > > This hunk is IMHO wrong, for NONDEBUG_INSN_P just PATTERN should be > scanned and nothing else. ?The rest looks good to me, though you need > someone to approve it. > > ? ? ? ?Jakub > I am testing this on Linux/x86. OK for trunk and 4.5 if no regressions? Thanks. -- H.J.
Attachment:
gcc-pr43921-2.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |