This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] support for -fdump-ada-spec

From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, joseph at codesourcery dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:03:06 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] support for -fdump-ada-spec
References: <20100426124645.GA29479@adacore.com> <t2v6c33472e1004260645z219fff82k27f5625537ec1ef5@mail.gmail.com> <20100426135202.GA17359@adacore.com>

On 26 April 2010 15:52, Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I agree that without the existing "wrong" usage, it would be far cleaner
> to have each .c file has it's own corresponding .h file (that's mandatory
> in Ada actually :-).

Or one .h file (the interface) for a module/library of several *.c
files. But those functions in diagnostics.h are not part of the
interface of the diagnostics machinery.

Thanks!

Manuel.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] support for -fdump-ada-spec
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [patch] support for -fdump-ada-spec
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: [patch] support for -fdump-ada-spec
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: [patch] support for -fdump-ada-spec
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]