This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Jie Zhang<jie@codesourcery.com> wrote:Thanks. Committed on trunk, 4.5 and 4.4 branches.On 04/10/2010 11:27 PM, Jie Zhang wrote:This is an updated patch, which addressed the comments in bugzilla. I added
On 04/10/2010 03:40 AM, Jie Zhang wrote:
On 04/10/2010 12:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:Thanks for reporting this. I'm testing this patch.This caused:
As you suggested, this patch moves call of init_caller_save to IRA main function. A flag "caller_save_initialized_p" is used to avoid duplicate initializations. When a reinitialization is need, that flag is set to false again such that caller-save will be initialized in the next call of init_caller_save. Testing is going on. Is it OK if no regressions?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662
No regressions found on bootstrap and testsuite on native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
to the test case as suggested by Mikael Pettersson. I also cleaned up the test case a little.
Is it OK?
Ok.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |