This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 43662 (was Re: [RFC] Fix PR 43562 -- 2nd try (was Re: [RFC] Fix PR 43562))
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 04/10/2010 11:27 PM, Jie Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On 04/10/2010 03:40 AM, Jie Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/10/2010 12:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As you suggested, this patch moves call of init_caller_save to IRA
>>>>>>>> main
>>>>>>>> function. A flag "caller_save_initialized_p" is used to avoid
>>>>>>>> duplicate
>>>>>>>> initializations. When a reinitialization is need, that flag is
>>>>>>>> set to
>>>>>>>> false again such that caller-save will be initialized in the next
>>>>>>>> call
>>>>>>>> of init_caller_save. Testing is going on. Is it OK if no
>>>>>>>> regressions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>> This caused:
>>>>
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662
>>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting this. I'm testing this patch.
>>>
>> No regressions found on bootstrap and testsuite on native
>> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>>
> This is an updated patch, which addressed the comments in bugzilla. I added
>
> /* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
>
> to the test case as suggested by Mikael Pettersson. I also cleaned up the
> test case a little.
>
> Is it OK?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
>
> Jie
>