This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments

From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:40:10 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1004151658550.5522@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <3C0C070B-1F8D-4EBD-A588-29224DF077E0@apple.com> <4BC823EE.8020402@gnu.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1004161121300.1078@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <k2r6c33472e1004160837kbd91a292wbe8df83a57b5ddc7@mail.gmail.com>

On 16 April 2010 17:37, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I do not see the fnspec simplifying things. On the contrary, it is
> the same inflation/complexity and in addition this complexity is

In fact, the fnspec is more complex in terms of usability, because for
valid combinations of attributes it forces the user to remember
additional characters.

Cheers,

Manuel.

References:
- [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] noclobber & noescape annotations for function arguments
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]