This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Dave Edwards <dave at IceraSemi dot com>
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, Rahul Kharche <rahul at IceraSemi dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, sdkteam-gnu <sdkteam-gnu at IceraSemi dot com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:44:35 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers
References: <4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E572544@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local> <m3d3y3azk9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4BC4D139.3000306@gnu.org> <4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E5F7A6D@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local>

On 04/14/2010 11:38 AM, Dave Edwards wrote:

This wouldn't work - CANON_BASE_FILE is*different*  for each included
file. With this approach we'd get the same string for each invokation of
the compiler, and thus we'd not get unique names.

But you would join that with __COUNTER__, not __LINE__.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers
  - From: Dave Edwards

References:
- [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers
  - From: Rahul Kharche
- Re: [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- RE: [PATCH][libcpp] Macros for unique named functions / identifiers
  - From: Dave Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]