This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [lto, build] Provide elf_getshdrstrndx replacement

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Rainer Orth <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:12:11 +0200
Subject: Re: [lto, build] Provide elf_getshdrstrndx replacement
References: <yddr5mj6onw.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <u2wb798aad51004131451t814a1d8aodbdf2b97bc0c244d@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 17:14, Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>
>> 2010-04-10 ?Rainer Orth ?<ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>>
>> ? ? ? ?toplevel:
>> ? ? ? ?* configure.ac: Check for elf_getshdrstrndx or elf_getshstrndx
>> ? ? ? ?separately.
>> ? ? ? ?* configure: Regenerate.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?gcc:
>> ? ? ? ?* configure.ac: Check for elf_getshdrstrndx or elf_getshstrndx
>> ? ? ? ?flavor.
>> ? ? ? ?* configure: Regenerate.
>> ? ? ? ?* config.in: Regenerate.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?gcc/lto:
>> ? ? ? ?* lto-elf.c [!HAVE_ELF_GETSHDRSTRNDX] (elf_getshdrstrndx): New
>> ? ? ? ?function.
>
> OK for trunk. ?Thanks for fixing this wart.
>
> I suppose that it's also OK for 4.5.1, but the RMs should decide that.

In principle yes after it got enough exposal for eventual autofoo
issues.

Richard.

>
> Diego.
>

References:
- [lto, build] Provide elf_getshdrstrndx replacement
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: [lto, build] Provide elf_getshdrstrndx replacement
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]