This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix c++/PR42844


On 04/13/2010 07:45 AM, Fabien CHÊNE wrote:
The wording should be "user-provided" because it is an adjective.

Yes.


FYI, instead of user-provided default constructor, Commeau, gives the
following error message: no explicitly declared default constructor.
Is it better ? Any better idea ?

"user-provided" is more correct. But in the case of cpp0x/defaulted2.C, the warning should explain that constructor is not user-provided because it is explicitly defaulted in the class body.


Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]