This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:01:19 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog?
- References: <20100326001316.GA11063@bromo.med.uc.edu> <20100327065613.GA25518@gmx.de> <20100327171734.GA26098@bromo.med.uc.edu> <cb9d34b21003271838x40f56504q2594903836530c87@mail.gmail.com> <20100328151408.GA26373@gmx.de> <cb9d34b21003280948q1e09590fsb3d0acd3fb8bf140@mail.gmail.com> <cb9d34b21003281040v1096372exd16e11817d5ef16c@mail.gmail.com> <l2jcb9d34b21004020934s7e53e17u5bcc3f960199eb9e@mail.gmail.com> <4BB620C3.2080702@gnu.org>
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/02/2010 06:34 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to ping these two patches.
> > Paolo, would these two patches be ok for trunk?
>
> What the RMs say.
Ok with a proper changelog entry.
Richard.