This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PING#2 Re: PING *objc, NeXT runtime, testsuite changes*
- From: Janis Johnson <janis dot marie dot johnson at gmail dot com>
- To: IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
- Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:13:49 -0700
- Subject: Re: PING#2 Re: PING *objc, NeXT runtime, testsuite changes*
- References: <20100216170327.B338C3BE0F@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20100217123505.C9DB33BE0F@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <088F1E0C-63BF-4CD4-A7EE-E25B1D0C2BED@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <20100217125917.665253BE0F@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <6FD479DC-04B8-41E2-A2D6-B4D2F9203B8D@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <20100217144628.844013BE0F@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <6446515E-6692-4607-B8B4-443889E59105@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <1266537242.1987.1.camel@janis-laptop> <EC0DEC89-09ED-43F3-BC39-6208D7820D30@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <30F08937-0DF8-426D-9135-32FC1ADFD8E3@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:39 AM, IainS <developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 19 Feb 2010, at 17:20, IainS wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Feb 2010, at 23:54, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sorry to have dropped the ball on reviewing the testsuite
>>> changes and I'll take a look in the next few days. ?Please let me know
>>> if there are things that I miss.
>>
>> In fact, I'm snowed-under with (day-job) work here - so only surfaced
>> briefly myself...
>>
>> I think the small ones are fairly self-contained.. (ObjC target-supports,
>> ? torture trivial tests(PR41609) )...
>>
>> ... I admit the big one looks significant - but actually, it's pretty much
>> the same thing over and over again..
>>
>> ... it would be very nice to get these out before 4.5 forks - the problem
>> has been there since 4.3 ... (PR35165)
>>
>> this is the latest diffs:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00742.html
>>
>> there is no changelog (yet) for the "biggie" - it didn't seem worth
>> writing one until the patch was reasonably agreed to be OK...
>>
>> ====
>>
>> for the other patches the changelogs are in:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01021.html
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01027.html
>>
>> (although the freshest patches are in the link above).
>
> The two small ones ought not to be too contentious (and Mike Stump already
> OKd this lot from the darwin POV).
>
> Iain
These changes are OK, except please start sentences in comments
with capital letters.
Janis