This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PING: PATCH to place_field for c++/42837 (abi/packed1.C failure on non-strict aligment targets)
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:29:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: PING: PATCH to place_field for c++/42837 (abi/packed1.C failure on non-strict aligment targets)
- References: <4B83020E.4070104@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RFA: PATCH to place_field for c++/42837 (abi/packed1.C failure on
> strict aligment targets)
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:53:53 -0500
> From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
> To: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> CC: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>
> On 02/19/2010 12:15 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> The test failed on Linux/ia32:
>>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/abi/packed1.C (test for excess errors)
>
> Oops. ?This patch fixes that; it doesn't make sense to warn about a
> particular field being unnecessarily packed if the whole type is.
>
> Testing now. ?OK for trunk if it passes?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.