This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 6/6] Devirtualization in ipa-cp
> @@ -531,6 +537,16 @@ ipcp_cloning_candidate_p (struct cgraph_
> return true;
comments ;) How this is different from BOTTOM in the lattice?
The patch overall seems to make sense. Please add describing comment on the
top of ipa-cp as we are now diverging from classical ipa-cp formulation
somewhat (but I can't seem to justify separate devirtualization pass that would
do precisely the same as ipa-cp does but at types only)
I guess patch is Ok with the comment for pretty-ipa, we can deal with the
unnecesary clonning issue later.