This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Pass down branch probability through dojump.c functions (PR middle-end/42233)

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:10:36 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pass down branch probability through dojump.c functions (PR middle-end/42233)
References: <20100218202004.GX2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <6dc9ffc81002190716ia97ea3aw966a2993eb72ad1@mail.gmail.com> <20100219161528.GB2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:16:13AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> This caused:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43121
>
> Here is an untested fix:
>
> 2010-02-19 ?Jakub Jelinek ?<jakub@redhat.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?PR bootstrap/43121
> ? ? ? ?* except.c (sjlj_emit_function_enter): Don't call
> ? ? ? ?add_reg_br_prob_note, instead add REG_BR_PROB note to the last insn
> ? ? ? ?directly.
> ? ? ? ?* rtl.h (add_reg_br_prob_note): Remove prototype.
>

It passed the failure point.

Thanks.

H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Pass down branch probability through dojump.c functions (PR middle-end/42233)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Pass down branch probability through dojump.c functions (PR middle-end/42233)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Pass down branch probability through dojump.c functions (PR middle-end/42233)
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Pass down branch probability through dojump.c functions (PR middle-end/42233)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]