This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Summary: unreviewed hook doc patches
- From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras dot ru>
- To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:51:43 +0300 (MSK)
- Subject: Re: Summary: unreviewed hook doc patches
- References: <20100208011959.97kdun7y1wkkc8kw-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Joern Rennecke wrote:
TARGET_SCHED_DFA_NEW_CYCLE
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00919.html
TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST_2
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00786.html
TARGET_SCHED_SPECULATE_INSN
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00790.html
TARGET_SCHED_FIRST_CYCLE_MULTIPASS_DFA_LOOKAHEAD_GUARD_SPEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00793.html
TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_SPEC_DS, TARGET_SCHED_GET_INSN_CHECKED_DS
TARGET_SCHED_SKIP_RTX_P
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00795.html
I have looked at these patches and the documentation changes look fine to me
(note, I cannot review or approve them). However, the placement of new
documentation (e.g. the description of TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST_2 hook)
puzzled me. Did I understand correctly that order in which hooks are
documented must match their declaration order in target.h?
Thanks.
--
Alexander Monakov