This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Review microblaze.md, suggestions
Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/04/2010 05:16 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
If all of the areas which you suggest be designed differently
must be done before the backend can be accepted, then I will
see if Xilinx is interested in pursuing this, or if they want
to withdraw the patch.
There is a reason why *this* message was titled "suggestions".
Sorry, I missed that.
That said, the way you're talking sounds like you're planning on getting
the port committed to mainline and then not working on it any more? Is
this true, or am I mis-interpreting your protestations?
I'm currently talking with Xilinx about future maintenance
of the MicroBlaze port.
Michael Eager email@example.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077