This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch PR39806] Potential fix for spurious code generation

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Olga Golovanevsky <OLGA at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, bonzini at gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:06:19 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch PR39806] Potential fix for spurious code generation
References: <84fc9c000911300516o75e230dbna0495664d90b83e3@mail.gmail.com> <OF2B42F737.468F74BF-ONC225767E.0050E2CE-C225767E.005269AB@il.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Olga Golovanevsky wrote:
> > If you are never walking the hashtable via htab_traverse drop
> > the patch, otherwise install it (it's still bogus then but less so).
> >
> > Richard.
> 
> I do walk. Committed.

Then you might want something like Richard's approach in tree-into-ssa.c from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01618.html, otherwise you risk
-g/-g0 code generation differences.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch PR39806] Potential fix for spurious code generation
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Re: [patch PR39806] Potential fix for spurious code generation
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch PR39806] Potential fix for spurious code generation
  - From: Olga Golovanevsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]