This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42048 & 42167
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- To: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:50:27 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 42048 & 42167
- References: <854832d40911250503o3045a11mdc07675f82d03a0@mail.gmail.com>
Janus Weil wrote:
> The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
OK - and thanks for the patch. However, please wait with the check a
while; currently, it seems to be undecided whether the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00868.html will be eliminated
from the SVN server (erasing its history), be reverted, or will stay.
(See lengthy threads in gcc@.)
Tobias
PS: When this patch is in, I plan to merge again the trunk into the
fortran-dev branch.
> 2009-11-25 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/42048
> PR fortran/42167
> * gfortran.h (gfc_is_function_return_value): New prototype.
> * match.c (gfc_match_call): Use new function
> 'gfc_is_function_return_value'.
> * primary.c (gfc_is_function_return_value): New function to check if a
> symbol is the return value of an encompassing function.
> (match_actual_arg,gfc_match_rvalue,match_variable): Use new function
> 'gfc_is_function_return_value'.
> * resolve.c (resolve_common_blocks,resolve_actual_arglist): Ditto.
>
> 2009-11-25 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/42048
> PR fortran/42167
> * gfortran.dg/select_type_10.f03: New test case.
> * gfortran.dg/typebound_call_11.f03: Extended test case.
>