This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:24:39PM +0000, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:11 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:I came across this ??? comment... in my testing, enabling scheduling for Thumb-2 is size-neutral and has performance benefits ranging from 1% to 20%. A couple of performance tests regress, but they are reasonable problems with non-clairvoyant register allocation (something was spilled because scheduling increased lifetimes).
This broke CSiBe builds for -Os and Thumb2 - I've filed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42031
for this. Could you take a look at this ?
Thanks for fixing this, Richard!
I'm surprised this did not show up in my testing...
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |