Re: [LTO merge][4/15][RFA] C++ front end

[Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>]

On 09/30/2009 09:10 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> +  /* Templates do not need assembler names.  */
> +  if (DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (decl)
> +      &&  (DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (decl)
> +           || DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (decl)))
> +    return false;

This is entirely the wrong test; Mark suggested it because he didn't 
understand what you were asking for.  This test finds decls that are 
related to templates, but doesn't discriminate between those that depend 
on template parameters and those which have all the template parameters 
replaced.

> We never see TEMPLATE_DECLs.  The root of the problem was that I
> was causing ICEs in the name mangler whenever I tried to create
> assembler names for certain VAR_DECLs and FUNCTION_DECLs.
>
> What they all have in common is that they either depend on
> template arguments or they are a template specialization.

It shouldn't happen for full specializations, only for partial 
specializations (that still depend on template parms).

But the question is, where are you getting these decls from?  What list 
do you find them on?

Jason