This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [LTO merge][4/15][RFA] C++ front end

Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 05:58 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> There should be
>> some semantic way to explain what class of entities you're trying to
>> exclude.
> 
> He wants to exclude uninstantiated templates, since only full
> instantiations get mangled names.  Do you have a better idea for how to
> do that?

Why are we running into VAR_DECLs and FUNCTION_DECLs instead of
TEMPLATE_DECLs, then?  It sounds like Diego is seeing the "exemplar" we
create, instead of the template.  Are we putting the exemplars, instead
of the templates, onto scope lists and such?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]