This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> It's not tight enough, otherwise it would have prevented the bug > in the PR because this test dominates the actual transformation > parts of this function. I meant, is it tight enough for the problem it is supposed to avoid? Maybe the problem for PR40987 is different. -- Eric Botcazou
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |