This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 5)

From: Stefan Dösinger <stefan at codeweavers dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:09:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 5)
References: <200909172322.38083.stefan@codeweavers.com> <90baa01f0909202317s5ce2cb67n68b5e47cf6d56ec3@mail.gmail.com>

Am Monday 21 September 2009 08:17:20 schrieb Kai Tietz:
> > 2009-09-09: Stefan Dösinger <stefan@codeweavers.com
> > ? ? ? ?* config/i386/i386.c, config/i386/i386.md: Add a new function
> > ? ? ? ?attribute ms_hook_prologue that starts functions with the same
> > opcode sequence used in most Win32 API functions
> >
> > ? ? ? ?* gcc.target/i386/ms_hook_prologue.c: New testcase
> >
> > ? ? ? ?* configure.ac: Test for swap suffix support in as
>
> So, as first part of this patch it is ok for windows targets. But
> please await a approval by an i386 maintainer here, too.
Is there any word from an i386 maintainer?

The recently applied static_chain_on_stack patches conflict with my patch, at 
least diff wise. I haven't yet figured out how the functionalities work 
together, but on a first glimpse it seems that some extra care is needed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 5)
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [PATCH] Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 5)
  - From: Stefan Dösinger
- Re: [PATCH] Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 5)
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]