This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch i386 4.4/trunk]: Fix sse restore for x86_64 in case of !sp_valid

From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "Ye, Joey" <joey dot ye at intel dot com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:38:48 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch i386 4.4/trunk]: Fix sse restore for x86_64 in case of !sp_valid
References: <90baa01f0909150911u3f588707gf7686551df8a751b@mail.gmail.com> <20090921110734.GF20776@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <90baa01f0909210412u6c51013fgb58345e22192f4db@mail.gmail.com>

Well, you are right. It can't get != 0 when no sseregs are present.
But well, it doesn't hurt here to check for it, as it isn't part of
to_allocate.
-- 
|  (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch i386 4.4/trunk]: Fix sse restore for x86_64 in case of !sp_valid
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- [patch i386 4.4/trunk]: Fix sse restore for x86_64 in case of !sp_valid
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch i386 4.4/trunk]: Fix sse restore for x86_64 in case of !sp_valid
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [patch i386 4.4/trunk]: Fix sse restore for x86_64 in case of !sp_valid
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]