This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 3)

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Ross Ridge <rridge at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:23:10 +0100
Subject: Re: Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 3)
References: <20090911164014.6C22173F67@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <90baa01f0909110945m6c322ad2u7f271cfde45fbe13@mail.gmail.com>

On Friday 11 September 2009 17:45:36, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2009/9/11 Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>:
> > Pedro Alves writes:
> >>Eh, then this doesn't make much sense to me then:
> >>
> >> ? "In order for the linker to produce a hotpatchable image, the .obj files
> >> ? must have been compiled with /hotpatch (Create Hotpatchable Image)."
> >>
> >>By my reading, that implies that there's _something_ in the .obj
> >>files to tag functions that might need the padding.
> >
> > I don't understand that reading at all. ?All that it's saying is that
> > using /functionpadmin alone won't make the resulting image hotpatchable.

I guess I can read it that way too, yeah.  Agreed.

-- 
Pedro Alves

References:
- Re: Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 3)
  - From: Ross Ridge
- Re: Add support for the Win32 hook prologue (try 3)
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]