This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Patch, Fortran, 4.5 regression, committed] PR 41242: PPC call rejected (related to user-defined assignment?)
- From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:56:17 +0200
- Subject: [Patch, Fortran, 4.5 regression, committed] PR 41242: PPC call rejected (related to user-defined assignment?)
Hi all,
I just committed the fix for this regression as r151620 (pre-approved by Paul).
Cheers,
Janus
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 151619)
+++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 151620)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2009-09-11 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/41242
+ * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_21.f90: New.
+
2009-09-10 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/31292
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_21.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_21.f90 (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_21.f90 (revision 151620)
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! PR 41242: [4.5 Regression] PPC call rejected (related to user-defined assignment?)
+!
+! Original test case by Juergen Reuter <reuter@physik.uni-freiburg.de>
+! Modified by Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ type :: nf_t
+ procedure(integer), nopass, pointer :: get_n_in
+ end type
+
+ interface assignment(=)
+ procedure op_assign
+ end interface
+
+ type(nf_t) :: prc_lib
+ prc_lib = "foobar"
+ print *, prc_lib%get_n_in()
+
+contains
+
+ elemental subroutine op_assign (str, ch)
+ type(nf_t), intent(out) :: str
+ character(len=*), intent(in) :: ch
+ end subroutine
+
+end
+
Index: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/ChangeLog (revision 151619)
+++ gcc/fortran/ChangeLog (revision 151620)
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2009-09-11 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/41242
+ * resolve.c (resolve_ordinary_assign): Don't call resolve_code,
+ to avoid that subsequent codes are resolved more than once.
+ (resolve_code): Make sure that type-bound assignment operators are
+ resolved correctly.
+
+
2009-09-10 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/31292
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 151619)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 151620)
@@ -6958,7 +6958,6 @@ resolve_ordinary_assign (gfc_code *code,
&& (lhs->symtree->n.sym == (*rhsptr)->symtree->n.sym))
*rhsptr = gfc_get_parentheses (*rhsptr);
- resolve_code (code, ns);
return true;
}
@@ -7190,7 +7189,12 @@ resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_namesp
break;
if (resolve_ordinary_assign (code, ns))
- goto call;
+ {
+ if (code->op == EXEC_COMPCALL)
+ goto compcall;
+ else
+ goto call;
+ }
break;
@@ -7241,6 +7245,7 @@ resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_namesp
break;
case EXEC_COMPCALL:
+ compcall:
resolve_typebound_call (code);
break;