This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:18:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions
References: <20090910114346.GA25670@redhat.com> <84fc9c000909100448t738bcf8bub9eb850a11ef04e7@mail.gmail.com> <20090910150914.GA1428@redhat.com>

On 09/10/2009 08:09 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

I am a little concerned that every time we create a function call we
have to search in the TM replacements hash, but I suppose it's only for
the TM case and doesn't affect anyone else.

You don't have to. Set the bit when we parse the attribute.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

References:
- [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]