This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi

From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
Cc: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:10:47 -0400
Subject: Re: rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi
References: <54eb586f220e92c689d03fcd9b1822d7d45e8599.1252439198.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <20090908235309.GA22521@hungry-tiger.westford.ibm.com> <7B26A903-55ED-4D39-AC0C-8D21DED1034E@kernel.crashing.org>

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Segher
Boessenkool<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

>> I took your patches, and fixed some of the TARGET_POWERPC64 issues that I
>> had
>> in my original code. ?Assuming there are no additional regressions, is
>> this ok
>> to apply?
>
> I would prefer to keep the patches separate; mine is a bug fix, yours is
> an essentially independent improvement.

I agree with Segher.  We have had too many problems recently caused by
merging bugfixes and cleanups and improvements at the same time in the
same patch.

Is there any difference between Segher's patch and the version of his
changes in your tree, Mike?

Thanks, David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi
  - From: Michael Meissner

References:
- rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi
  - From: Michael Meissner
- Re: rs6000: Some fixes for bswapdi
  - From: Segher Boessenkool

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]