This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [vta->trunk] VTA merge
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:16:10 -0400
- Subject: Re: [vta->trunk] VTA merge
- References: <orskfb6zb2.fsf@huru.localdomain> <84fc9c000908300345s473a12f5u1b25ba054ca5f9a1@mail.gmail.com> <or7hwk9xxy.fsf@huru.localdomain> <84fc9c000908310230n3cbfc13bn1f83fcc6e0e688e9@mail.gmail.com> <ork50j8vks.fsf@huru.localdomain>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Alexandre Oliva<aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> How does this patch, on top of vta-patchset.patch, look? ?(ChangeLog
> still pending) It has just finished building stage1 on x86_64-linux-gnu,
> but it's otherwise untested.
Well, your original patchset doesn't apply cleanly.
There's a typo in the original here:
patch: **** malformed patch at line 18175: i+ vt_debug_insns_local (true);
I deleted the 'i' at the beginning of the line.
Also, there's this:
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gcc/fwprop.c.rej
I'm guessing that you want your cleanup patch to be applied after
applying your initial patch. However, your initial patch doesn't
apply. So, can you provide a complete patch that I can test on mingw
targets? As opposed to broken first patches and cleanup patches that
won't apply on top of them?