This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [www/bugzilla] PR 36739 Proposal for clarifications in GCC Bugzilla


2009/8/9 Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Richard
> Guenther<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Manuel
>> López-Ibáñez<lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The following patch simplifies the form to report bugs and explains
>>> that a testcase may be added after filling the form.
>>>
>>> I am not sure how to test such patch but if the form gets broken in
>>> some way, we can always revert it.
>>>
>>> OK to commit?
>>
>> Hmm, there's not much context in the patch and I see no ChangeLog entry.
>> So, how did you simplify the form? (I see you disabled at least the host
>> triplet)

Yes, sorry, I should have added a ChangeLog entry.

> btw, rather than simplifying the host/target/build triplets could use a link
> to a description of the fields ;) ?Also what I usually miss is the list of
> known-to-work revisions, maybe you can add/enable that.

Yes, I disabled the three triplets, because they are meaningless for
most users, and most of the time they should be left blank.
Knowledgeable reporters can always fill the details later.

I also disabled the Initial State because is useless information.

I would also disable the "Assigned To", and "Blocks", but this patch
is a good start.

I think the form should be as simple as possible.

Cheers,

Manuel.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]